|
Additional Case Information
In late May, 2009, customers in various states received a notice in the mail asking if they wish to cancel their debt management plans or transfer to another provider. This notice was sent because of the April 6 and April 14, 2009 Orders from the Court. The Defendants have appealed the April 6 and April 14, 2009 Orders. Both the trial court and the appellate court denied the Defendants’ request to stop enforcement of the April 6 and April 14, 2009 Orders while the appeal is being decided.
In late May 2008, customers in New York and Vermont received a notice in the mail asking if they wanted to cancel their debt management plan or transfer to another provider.
In early July, customers in Arizona, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma and Utah received a notice in the mail asking if they wanted to cancel their
debt management plan or transfer to another provider.
In late July 2008, customers in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia received a notice in the mail asking if they wish to cancel their debt management plan or transfer to another provider. Debt management plans of customers who do not respond, will be transferred to another provider upon signing a new contract.
In late July 2008, customers in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming received a notice in the mail asking if they wish to cancel their debt management plans, agree to a debt management plan with Express Consolidation, Inc., or transfer to another provider. Debt management plans of customers who do
not respond, will be automatically transferred to Express Consolidation, Inc.
|
